« 8. Priorities for 2008-11 | Main | 6. Key performance indicators »

Comments

John Baxter

Apart from 7.2 - sad. Reads like some plan to be implemented when we colonize Mars.

Lesley Wood

I welcome the idea of funding to support VCOs to get ready for public service delivery (7.8) but it is urgently needed- now. Small and medium sized organisations are struggling to survive, and larger ones to maintain services. Good staff are leaving the sector. This VCS capacity, once lost, will take a long time to restore.
The link to social enterprise support suggests that Capacity Builders should be talking to RDAs about deploying their Business Links resources more creatively to meet the infrastructure needs of third sector organisations in a more bespoke and effective manner.
For the record, what is needed is the capacity to support:
Consortium development
Marketing and communication
Lobbying, brokerage and negotiation with agency commissioners who have patchy understanding of third sector roles and needs
As well as all the usual stuff about business practice and planning.

stephen woollett

6. Priorities for 2006-8
6.1 CapacityBuilders should refer to "infrastructure consortia" rather than "ChangeUp consortia”. ChangeUp is just one source of investment and one that may well have a limited life. Infrastructure consortia and individual organisations need to broaden their approach to investment and must be discouraged from having "all their eggs in the ChangeUp basket".

6.2 A corollary of this is that the consortia review process must strike a balance between recognising the independence and wide ownership of consortia, the need for flexibility to reflect local circumstances with the reasonable need for robust, transparent and effective governance and accountability processes.

6.3 We think it is appropriate to take an open and broad approach to national support services - thinking more laterally than the current six high level objective themes. One option might be to structure services around three themes:
• Third Sector effectiveness
• Third Sector investment
• Volunteering development

6.4 In devising appropriate models of delivering support services nationally the following principles should be adopted:
• Users (e.g. front-line VCOs) have real influence on what and how services are delivered.
• Services are fully joined up "horizontally" (between themes) and "vertically" (local-regional-national).
• Direct delivery at regional or local level should be in partnership and consultation with infrastructure organisations and consortia operating at that level.
• Service providers should be accountable to front line organisations through appropriate mechanisms.

6.5 Destination 2014 needs to recognise that in the main social enterprises require distinctive infrastructure services and organisations designed to meet their particular needs. These services must be well connected into infrastructure for VCO to ensure good signposting and cross-referral and collaboration on matters of common interest but cannot simply be "bolted on" to existing VCO structures. A clear distinctive national strategy for social enterprise infrastructure, albeit one which dovetails with VCO infrastructure, is required within a revised 2014 strategy. This needs to reflect government's strong encouragement that social enterprise support is linked into mainstream business support structures focussed on Business Link.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment